• About Me
    • Breath Training
    • Yoga + Mobility Training
  • Yogathletic App
    • Focus + Flow
    • Personal Coaching
    • Corporate Coaching
    • In Person Events
  • Blog
  • Contact
Menu

Matt Gill

Street Address
City, State, Zip
+44 7956 905 583
YOGA FOR SQUASH

Your Custom Text Here

Matt Gill

  • What I Do
    • About Me
    • Breath Training
    • Yoga + Mobility Training
  • Yogathletic App
  • Online Courses
    • Focus + Flow
  • Work with me
    • Personal Coaching
    • Corporate Coaching
    • In Person Events
  • Blog
  • Contact

Beware The Perils Of Abstract Landmarks

March 22, 2019 Matt Gill
BEWARE.jpg

We stretch for the feet in folds, strain to 'take the bind' with our hands and crane our necks around to get a deeper twist...

Some of us even try hooking our legs behind our neck...or try tapping our feet and head together in back bends. 

I’ve done all of these things...and more besides.

And my experience of practice tells me that when we become overly fixated on these arbitrary goals it often comes at the expense of the quality and form of our movement…we start to quite literally pull ourselves out of alignment (physically and perhaps also mentally and energetically).

Because when we pull and push to contort ourselves into postures with force, it is rarely done with much thought to the mechanics of the body or based on an intuitive sense of how the body is feeling and what would serve it best.

Instead, we tend to lose our connection to practice as a bodily enquiry and allow the goal-oriented mind to assume the driver’s seat (and being honest…for most of us it already spends a little too long sat there). 

And when that tendency to push and strive becomes so strong that we override the body’s feedback mechanisms, then we also create a greater risk of injuring  ourselves (I’ve done this too…).

This is why I’m of the opinion that abstract bodily landmarks are false friends in our yoga practice - yes, the feet can be a convenient point of reference to move towards in a forward fold, but if stretching for the feet or holding onto them for dear life doesn’t serve the body then it becomes not only unhelpful but potentially a problem.

It’s for this reason that I prefer to take these landmarks out of the equation as much as possible - for example taking a seated fold with the hands joined at the chest, so there simply isn't an option to hold the feet - or taking 'hands free' twists so that the rotation has to be created internally rather than through the leverage of the arms. 

This approach will teach us to start owning and controlling our bodies through the ranges of movement we have, rather than constantly encouraging the pursuit of more flexibility (there comes a point when enough is enough…) - to build the capacity for moving with a greater sense of stability, autonomy and control.

It also encourages students to embrace exploration and inquiry over ‘achievement’ - to sense into their own felt experience of the practice rather than worry about attaining the ‘peak expression’ of a given pose.

This is partly why I’m not such a big fan of adjustments and why I also tend to avoid encouraging use of binds or other methods that allow students to hold a position ‘artificially’ (i.e. without internal control of their body). Instead I try to help students develop the ability to move in ways that really serve their body best (which means less extreme range, more strength and stability through the ranges that are already there). 

Admittedly for most of us this approach requires a little un-learning and re-learning - particularly when we’re used to approaching our yoga practice in the way that is often encouraged, with such a premium placed on extreme flexibility.

But I’m finding that most students are pretty responsive to it and I believe that over time they'll come to feel their bodies are thankful for it too. And if it sounds like an approach you'd like to explore for yourself then please do join my weekly all levels classes in Waterloo where we'll dive into this experientially in our practice.

Tags yoga, mindfulness, frc, functional range conditioning, functional movement
Comment

Knowing is Overrated

November 22, 2018 Matt Gill
Never trust people who are 'sure' of things...trust those who are temporarily confident in their current interpretations. (1).png

The above quote is from Dr. Andreo Spina, founder of the Functional Range Conditioning system of mobility training...an incredibly smart approach to working with the body.

I've been exploring his techniques for developing mobility for a while now, and a few weeks ago I took a certification in the system (I'm now an officially designated FRC 'mobility specialist' :))...and this exploration has led me to question many things that I previously thought I 'knew'.

Many of us, myself included, place a lot of store in 'knowing things', in looking for concrete answers and being 'sure' about things. Sometimes we look to science to support this knowledge...without acknowledging that science (like everything else) is also not fixed, but an evolving entity.

And I have to say that yoga's pedagogy can often be particularly guilty of making statements of fact that leave little room for questions, challenge or evolution.

Personally I believe that part of the reason is due to the heritage of the 'guru culture' in yoga - that the teacher's instructions are to be accepted as fact and not questioned.

If you read the hatha yoga scriptures you'll find many descriptions of the benefits of practising poses (including eternal life!) presented as absolute certain fact...many of these assertions (and more recent ones too) have become so ingrained that they are no longer questioned.

For example I often hear it stated with confidence that practising shoulder stand 'is beneficial for thyroid problems' - but there is absolutely NO evidence to support this...the only thing we can be sure about is that practising shoulder stand makes you better at doing shoulder stand (unless you hurt your neck...). 

This is just one example but I could list countless others.

If you contrast this with the approach taken by movement scientists and trainers you will find that they often use the 'language of possibility' (e.g. the current evidence suggests that doing x MAY lead to y) - and their assertions are usually supported by considered research rather than seemingly being plucked out of thin air.

So where does this somewhat ironic attachment to accepted wisdom in yoga stem from - is it  a lack of empowerment (accepting what we're told because it comes from a 'higher authority'), dogmatism, quality of training, laziness...or because things are being taken out of the context for which they were originally intended?

I don't know, but I do feel that it's very limiting because 'knowing' limits the potential for discovery and asking questions - if everything is fixed then where is the opportunity for uncovering new possibilities? Surely yoga is first and foremost a practice of exploration, of diving into our inner experience and finding our own truth? 

It's also very liberating to be open to exploring new possibilities and revising our perspective when we discover approaches that serve us better (as long as we're clear on why we're doing something a particular way, and, to quote Dr.Spina again, we're 'confident in our current interpretation').

This is why you may occasionally notice that I'm teaching something differently to the way I was 6 months ago - because I'm always looking to evolve my teaching in ways that serve my students best

So how about rather than being satisfied with 'knowing' we embrace 'not knowing' instead - always questioning, always exploring, always discovering new possibilities and always seeking to expand our understanding?

Thanks for reading and enjoy your practice. 

Tags yoga, functional movement, functional range conditioning, mobility, alignment, benefits of yoga
Comment

The Evolution of Practice

May 31, 2018 Matt Gill
'Cat stretch' is a great way to explore spinal flexion

'Cat stretch' is a great way to explore spinal flexion

What brings you to practice? What are your motivations and intentions?

When I was younger I played squash to a fairly decent, competitive level...so much of my motivation for moving and exercising was for competition. And up to my mid 20s aesthetics were also a big motivation for me - simply put, I wanted to look better. 

When I found yoga, the motivation moved away from aesthetics...I loved exploring the movement and flow of the practice. But without realising it, I'd come to play out a lot of my existing patterns and behaviours through my practice (in yoga these are often referred to as samskaras...all that really means is a conditioned way of doing / seeing / thinking about things). 

I'd push myself hard and really test the limits of what my body was capable of...striving to 'get the next pose' which was a big motivation in the system of yoga I was practising. It took me a long time to realise what was going on...that I was striving and pushing so hard because I didn't feel good enough as I was. 

In the last few years the focus for my practice has shifted to a more functional approach - trying to get my body to work as well as possible. I still include a lot of challenging, strength building elements in my practice because I believe in the benefits of cultivating strength, proprioception and mobility...but my contortionist days are over. I'm also increasingly exploring other movement disciplines because, well, I love movement and I think it's healthy to mix things up. 

But is it 'yoga'? For me the answer is a resounding yes - these days I believe that the form of the practice is much less important the its function. After all it doesn't really matter 'what' we do but how we're use our practice to cultivate greater awareness, presence and compassion. 

Tags yoga, functional movement, mobility
Comment

©2025 Matt Gill 

Privacy Policy / Terms of Use / Cookie Policy / Disclaimer